does there need to have been excuse derrivatives to have a conversation?
while a name that starts with the letter h( ? ) [ ends with the letter n; an o is also part of the name ] is sitting on the chair, wondering what to write about, the phone rings. slightly startled, answers the phone, your lack of awareness acknowledged, as a gentle individual, makes self known as ' a name that starts with the letter m. ' ( somewhat official sounding tone, declaring, rather blandly - ' the letter i interests me ' ).h( ? ): ' great... i was about to call you anyway; glad to hear from you - how are things? '
m( ? ): ' things are just fine, they would be better if a dozen aspects of my life were different, yet you know... such is the form of living currently how that goes as of now. '
h( ? ): ' sad to hear that. i've my own set of struggles. there are so many thoughts going through my mind. training to think about travel while the mind will be focused to meditate was one of the goals in mind. like medicine, with more meditation, life may lilely start to improve. '
m( ? ): ' a little bit off in left field, though one could entertain this idea for now: sure within some form or another, an applied science becomes a cool technique to arrive upon a state where there's the realization that we're on a plane that has yet to have departed toward a destination. '
h( ? ): ' what is the hell? ' according to an informant, there shall be no answer for now. this value might change. would you like to do this thought experiment? '